Facilities and the 356h Form - Ensuring All Relevant Manufacturing Establishments are Appropriately Identified in FDA Drug Applications

1 min

FDA released its Guidance for Industry (GFI) regarding Identification of Manufacturing Establishments in Applications Submitted to CBER and CDER: Questions and Answers on October 22, 2019. Internally at the FDA this GFI is commonly referred to as the ‘356h guidance’, as it covers the information required on the FDA 356h form when submitting original or supplemental new drug application, abbreviated new drug application, biologics license application or a related amendment.

Specifically, the GFI details the FDA’s expectations for facility information required on the form, including manufacturing, packaging, and control sites for both drug substance and drug product facilities associated with the application and its placement on the form. This GFI provides for:

  • FDA’s recommendation on what information should be provided in FDA 356h form versus Module 3 of the application
  • Clarification that the facilities listed within the FDA 356h form do not necessarily require a facility to have an FDA Establishment Identifier (FEI) number prior to application submission. However, indication of the FEI number on the form may expedite subsequent application processing steps.
  • Clarification that all facilities listed on the FDA 356h form are not necessarily subjected to a user fee. The function of the facility dictates whether a user fee is assessed.
  • A sample template to be utilized for inclusion of relevant facility information in Module 3 of the application, whose utilization is highly recommended.

Conforming to the expectations in this GFI for appropriate and complete facility information will allow firms to avoid subsequent information requests, refusal-to-file, or refuse-to-receive actions associated with applications to increase application assessment efficiency.

Please note this is a final GFI and reflects the FDA’s current thinking on the topic. There will not be a public comment period on the guidance prior to its finalization as this is a level 2 guidance offering clarification only and is not introducing any new policy.

Return to Insights Center

Related Insights

Blog

Accelerating Delivery and Patient Access to Rare Disease Treatments – Highlights from World Orphan Drug Congress

May 2, 2024

Video

Cell & Gene Therapies: A Regulatory Update

Jul 22, 2022

Article

New FDA Guidance Addresses the Need for Data-Generation Strategies Across the Drug Development Lifecycle

May 10, 2022

Blog

Maintaining Data Integrity for Quality and Compliance – Essential Despite Pandemic Disruptions

May 16, 2022

Podcast

RBQM Podcast Series | Episode 3: Staying within the Guardrails: How to Push the Boundaries in a Highly Regulated Industry

Jun 16, 2022

Article

8 things you need to know about eCTDs in China

Jul 1, 2022

Blog

Preparing for the New Era of Hybrid Regulatory Inspections

Jul 11, 2022

Article

EU Orphan Drug Designation – overcoming regulatory challenges

Jul 20, 2022

Blog

U.S. drug price reform of 2022: What does the Inflation Reduction Act mean for drug manufacturers?

Aug 17, 2022

Article

New endpoints for early-stage cancer are gaining regulatory traction

Jan 28, 2022

Article

Q&A Project Optimus: What you need to know

Oct 11, 2022

Article

Relyvrio Approval: Lessons Learned

Oct 31, 2022