New PIC/S recommendation for evaluating PQS effectiveness in relation to risk-based change management

2 min

On November 28, 2019 the Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-Operation Scheme (PIC/S) published a draft Recommendation for Participating Authorities, providing practical guidance for GMP inspectors, on how to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical quality system (PQS) in relation to risk-based change management.(1)

The PIC/S GMP Guide requires companies to have an effective PQS and apply quality risk management (QRM) principles to change control activities.

Chapter 1 states:

· Principle: …there must be ‘a comprehensively designed and correctly implemented Pharmaceutical Quality System incorporating Good Manufacturing Practice and Quality Risk Management. It should be fully documented and its effectiveness monitored’.

· 1.3 ...’the effectiveness of the system is normally demonstrated at the site level’.

· 1.5 ‘Senior management has the ultimate responsibility to ensure an effective Pharmaceutical Quality System is in place...’

· 1.4 (xii) Arrangements [should be] in place ‘for the prospective evaluation of planned changes and their approval prior to implementation…’

Annex 15 states:

· 11.1. ‘The control of change is an important part of knowledge management and should be handled within the pharmaceutical quality system.’

· 11.4. ‘Quality risk management should be used to evaluate planned changes… and to plan for any necessary process validation, verification or requalification efforts.’

· 11.7. ‘…an evaluation of the effectiveness of change should be carried out…’

The recommendation was prepared by the PIC/S Expert Circle on QRM and does not create any new GMP requirements or expectations. It simply provides inspectors with a tool to support an evaluation of PQS effectiveness in relation to risk-based change management. It has been designed to help inspectors increase their understanding of what risk-based change management means at a practical level, and then give a framework to help see how effective implementation might be demonstrated by pharmaceutical companies. The tool provides a checklist approach focusing on:

· Change proposals – Determination of when a change is needed

· Change risk assessments

· Change Planning and implementation

· Change review and effectiveness

The recommendation is currently a draft that is being applied on a 6-month trial basis, with an expectation that formal adoption will subsequently occur on a revised version following comments on use of the tool by PIC/S participating authorities.

Of more significance than the use of the tool by inspectors over the coming months, is that this move starts to see a shift, albeit a small one, towards greater risk-based regulatory oversight as envisaged in ICH Q10 (Pharmaceutical Quality System) and Q12 (Lifecycle Management). (2)

(1) https://www.picscheme.org/en/news

(2) https://www.ich.org/page/quality-guidelines

Return to Insights Center

Related Insights

Blog

New FDA draft guidance: Implications for simplifying interchangeability for biosimilars in the US

Jul 16, 2024

Article

Five strategies for meeting the requirements of Project Optimus and improving the chances of approval

Nov 10, 2022

Podcast

RBQM Podcast Series | Episode 3: Staying within the Guardrails: How to Push the Boundaries in a Highly Regulated Industry

Jun 16, 2022

Article

8 things you need to know about eCTDs in China

Jul 1, 2022

Blog

Preparing for the New Era of Hybrid Regulatory Inspections

Jul 11, 2022

Article

EU Orphan Drug Designation – overcoming regulatory challenges

Jul 20, 2022

Video

Cell & Gene Therapies: A Regulatory Update

Jul 22, 2022

Blog

U.S. drug price reform of 2022: What does the Inflation Reduction Act mean for drug manufacturers?

Aug 17, 2022

Article

Q&A Project Optimus: What you need to know

Oct 11, 2022

Article

Relyvrio Approval: Lessons Learned

Oct 31, 2022

Playbook

Are you using real-world evidence?

Feb 1, 2023

Article

New FDA Guidance Addresses the Need for Data-Generation Strategies Across the Drug Development Lifecycle

May 10, 2022