Former FDA expert provides valuable advice on INTERACT programs for CBER products
Many sponsors of CBER-regulated products are familiar with pre-IND meetings, but there’s a new program called INTERACT, which stands for Initial Targeted Engagement for Regulatory Advice on CBER products. FDA’s goal for INTERACT is to provide advice to sponsors even earlier during development than what’s allowed under the pre-IND program. INTERACT provides an opportunity to obtain informal and non-binding FDA feedback on specific CMC, preclinical, and clinical issues that are raised by the sponsor in the briefing package.
In my opinion, all sponsors should consider scheduling an INTERACT meeting, since FDA’s feedback at this critical stage in development can lead to tremendous time and cost savings.
The optimal timing for INTERACT is after preliminary preclinical proof-of-concept (POC) and safety data have been generated but prior to initiation of definitive preclinical studies. Only one INTERACT meeting is granted per development program, and a teleconference is the only option for the type of meeting. Although there are no PDUFA-mandated timelines for INTERACT, CBER tries to schedule the teleconference as soon as feasible.
Some key elements to include in the briefing package are:
- A detailed scientific rationale for studying the product in the proposed study population
- CMC Information
- Description of the investigational product and manufacturing procedures
- Preclinical Information
- Detailed summary of completed in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies
- Results of POC and pilot safety studies
- Summary of the overall preclinical development plan, including discussion of future preclinical studies that are intended to provide safety justification for the clinical study
- Clinical Information
- Brief synopsis of the initial clinical study and overall clinical development plan
- Rationale for the target patient population
- Intended dosing regimen for the clinical study
- Safety and feasibility justification for the study procedures -- e.g., choice of the route of administration and dedicated delivery device(s)
Here’s some advice for an effective INTERACT meeting:
- Be sure not to schedule the meeting too early or too late in development
- Ensure that the content of the briefing package is sufficiently detailed
- Ask pointed questions in the briefing package regarding important CMC, preclinical, and clinical issues
- Avoid giving an extensive introductory summary, which reduces the time for substantive discussion during the teleconference
- Plan out the agenda to maximize time spent discussing key issues
- Understand that FDA generally will not agree to new proposals during the INTERACT meeting
- Request clarification if FDA’s rationale is unclear
- Ask the FDA Review Team about the possibility of additional interactions – e.g., if you’d like to receive feedback on a future preclinical protocol
Further information about INTERACT can be found on the FDA website: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/industry-biologics/interact-meetings-initial-targeted-engagement-regulatory-advice-cber-products.
Related Insights
Case Study
Speed meets strategy: Delivering a critical FDA 1572 package in just seven days
Sep 9, 2026
Blog
Actioning the commitment letter: The PDUFA VIII changes that matter most to sponsors
Aug 25, 2026
Blog
Data without borders: Assessing China-only evidence for EMA approval – insights from ex-EMA and seasoned subject matter experts
Aug 19, 2026
Blog
The Next Frontier of ADC Development: Navigating an Evolving Regulatory Landscape
Aug 12, 2026
Webinar
From APAC to Global: Designing Data that Travels
Jul 16, 2026
Blog
Regulatory submissions as a source of insight: How AI can amplify the value of our work
Jul 15, 2026
Blog
Accelerating first-in-human studies: Why the FDA’s Expedited IND pilot signals a new era for early development
Jul 6, 2026
CTB Blog
A credible global regulatory strategy is an early-phase imperative, not a late-stage commercial exercise
Jun 23, 2026
CTB Blog
Understanding FDA complete response letters: Why CMC readiness must become a strategic priority
Jun 18, 2026
Case Study
Case study: Repositioning first-in-human development at speed
Jun 8, 2026
Blog
Beyond participation: How EU HTA is turning patient and clinician engagement into evidence architecture
May 26, 2026
Playbook
JCA in the EU: A roadmap for health technology developers
May 15, 2026
Related Insights
Case Study
Speed meets strategy: Delivering a critical FDA 1572 package in just seven days
Sep 9, 2026
Blog
Actioning the commitment letter: The PDUFA VIII changes that matter most to sponsors
Aug 25, 2026
Blog
Data without borders: Assessing China-only evidence for EMA approval – insights from ex-EMA and seasoned subject matter experts
Aug 19, 2026
Blog
The Next Frontier of ADC Development: Navigating an Evolving Regulatory Landscape
Aug 12, 2026
Webinar
From APAC to Global: Designing Data that Travels
Jul 16, 2026
Blog
Regulatory submissions as a source of insight: How AI can amplify the value of our work
Jul 15, 2026
Blog
Accelerating first-in-human studies: Why the FDA’s Expedited IND pilot signals a new era for early development
Jul 6, 2026
CTB Blog
A credible global regulatory strategy is an early-phase imperative, not a late-stage commercial exercise
Jun 23, 2026
CTB Blog
Understanding FDA complete response letters: Why CMC readiness must become a strategic priority
Jun 18, 2026
Case Study
Case study: Repositioning first-in-human development at speed
Jun 8, 2026
Blog
Beyond participation: How EU HTA is turning patient and clinician engagement into evidence architecture
May 26, 2026
Playbook
JCA in the EU: A roadmap for health technology developers
May 15, 2026

