Speed meets strategy: Delivering a critical FDA 1572 package in just seven days
When a sponsor urgently required a completed Form FDA 1572 package within seven days to support a critical oncology Investigational New Drug (IND) submission, the stakes were high. At the time the sponsor engaged Parexel, previous delays had already compressed the timeline and threatened broader submission and funding milestones, leaving no room for setbacks.
In addition, Parexel’s Site Alliance team initially received a draft version of the protocol, adding complexity to an already compressed timeline and requiring speed, precision, and close collaboration with the selected site as key protocol details were reviewed and finalized.
Identifying the right investigator quickly
To meet the accelerated timeline, Parexel's Site Alliance team turned to one of its key differentiators: proprietary site intelligence and profiling capabilities.
Unlike traditional feasibility approaches that focus primarily on patient availability, Parexel maintains detailed profiles across its network of research sites that capture a deeper level of insight including operational readiness, investigator interests, logistical considerations, and other factors that can influence study startup performance. This deeper understanding enables the team to identify investigators who are not only scientifically qualified but also well-positioned to engage quickly and effectively.
Using these insights, the team rapidly identified a top-performing oncology investigator whose expertise, patient population, and research interests aligned with the sponsor's opportunity.
The value of trusted site relationships
Data alone was only part of the solution.
Years of relationship building with investigators and research site staff enabled the Site Alliance team to engage the selected investigator quickly and confidently. Because the team had a deep understanding of the investigator's priorities and areas of interest, conversations were focused, relevant, and productive from the outset.
This established trust proved especially valuable given the compressed timeline. Rather than navigating lengthy introductions or exploratory discussions, the team was able to move directly toward collaboration, helping keep the project on track despite the challenging circumstances.
Balancing urgency with responsible site stewardship
As pressure mounted to secure a site rapidly, the sponsor requested outreach to multiple investigators simultaneously. While broad outreach may have generated additional options, Parexel's Site Alliance team recognized the potential impact on its site network.
Engaging numerous investigators for a single opportunity can create unnecessary work for sites that ultimately will not be selected, potentially straining valuable relationships over time.
Instead, the team recommended a more strategic approach. A primary investigator was carefully selected based on alignment and readiness, while a qualified backup investigator was identified and maintained as a contingency. This approach ensured business continuity without creating unnecessary burden for the broader site community.
The strategy reflected an important principle of the Site Alliance model: strong site partnerships are built not only through engagement, but also through thoughtful stewardship of site resources and investigator time.
Delivering results under pressure
Through a combination of proprietary site intelligence, strong investigator relationships, and close cross-functional collaboration, Parexel successfully delivered the required FDA 1572 package within the sponsor's accelerated timeline.
The project progressed from initial request to site review and document delivery in a matter of days, enabling the sponsor to keep its critical IND submission on track. Following the successful execution of the project, the Site Alliance team also helped secure a remote qualification visit, further strengthening the partnership and advancing the opportunity.
A model for study startup
As clinical development timelines continue to accelerate, sponsors increasingly need partners who can do more than identify eligible investigators. Success depends on the ability to rapidly connect sponsors with the right sites, engage investigators efficiently, and execute with precision under pressure.
This project demonstrated how the combination of data-driven site selection and trusted investigator relationships can help overcome even the most compressed timelines. By leveraging deep site intelligence, strategic network management, and strong site partnerships, Parexel transformed a high-pressure challenge into a successful outcome, helping a sponsor achieve a critical development milestone when timing mattered most.
Related Insights
Blog
Data without borders: Assessing China-only evidence for EMA approval – insights from ex-EMA and seasoned subject matter experts
Aug 19, 2026
Blog
Actioning the commitment letter: The PDUFA VIII changes that matter most to sponsors
Aug 25, 2026
Blog
The Next Frontier of ADC Development: Navigating an Evolving Regulatory Landscape
Aug 12, 2026
Webinar
From APAC to global: Designing data that travels
Jul 16, 2026
Blog
Regulatory submissions as a source of insight: How AI can amplify the value of our work
Jul 15, 2026
Blog
Accelerating first-in-human studies: Why the FDA’s Expedited IND pilot signals a new era for early development
Jul 6, 2026
CTB Blog
A credible global regulatory strategy is an early-phase imperative, not a late-stage commercial exercise
Jun 23, 2026
CTB Blog
Understanding FDA complete response letters: Why CMC readiness must become a strategic priority
Jun 18, 2026
Case Study
Case study: Repositioning first-in-human development at speed
Jun 8, 2026
Blog
Beyond participation: How EU HTA is turning patient and clinician engagement into evidence architecture
May 26, 2026
Playbook
JCA in the EU: A roadmap for health technology developers
May 15, 2026
Blog
Understanding the FDA’s latest guidance on safety assessment of genome editing therapies using next-generation sequencing
Apr 23, 2026
Related Insights
Blog
Data without borders: Assessing China-only evidence for EMA approval – insights from ex-EMA and seasoned subject matter experts
Aug 19, 2026
Blog
Actioning the commitment letter: The PDUFA VIII changes that matter most to sponsors
Aug 25, 2026
Blog
The Next Frontier of ADC Development: Navigating an Evolving Regulatory Landscape
Aug 12, 2026
Webinar
From APAC to global: Designing data that travels
Jul 16, 2026
Blog
Regulatory submissions as a source of insight: How AI can amplify the value of our work
Jul 15, 2026
Blog
Accelerating first-in-human studies: Why the FDA’s Expedited IND pilot signals a new era for early development
Jul 6, 2026
CTB Blog
A credible global regulatory strategy is an early-phase imperative, not a late-stage commercial exercise
Jun 23, 2026
CTB Blog
Understanding FDA complete response letters: Why CMC readiness must become a strategic priority
Jun 18, 2026
Case Study
Case study: Repositioning first-in-human development at speed
Jun 8, 2026
Blog
Beyond participation: How EU HTA is turning patient and clinician engagement into evidence architecture
May 26, 2026
Playbook
JCA in the EU: A roadmap for health technology developers
May 15, 2026
Blog
Understanding the FDA’s latest guidance on safety assessment of genome editing therapies using next-generation sequencing
Apr 23, 2026

